Once there was a kingdom in a distant land. In this kingdom, whenever someone said something, they got a farthing, and a second one whenever someone responded. Some would take advantage of this by being generally sociable, or by raising heated, but intelligent, debates, or by fancying themselves poets or novelists. Hovever, many simply kept a constant stream of pointless--or even meaningless--speach, only closing their mouths long enough to consider it a separate oration, or merely invited others to speak, letting them earn their money without making any meaningfull contribution. Organisations sprang up where people would do nothing but say meaningless speach at each other, so greedy were they.
"What's your favourite colour?"
"Red"
"Blue"
"Good point"
"Four"
Those of you who aren't part of the kingdom of Gather may need some clarification. In it, every post and comment gets you some "Gather Points" (actually worth closer to one and a half American cents), which can be cashed in for items at various stores, or actual money in amounts of at least $50US--or roughly 3000 points--in a single month. This is ment to make you submit meaningful content--after all, if it were meaningless, why would people comment on it?
Many actually do, but there is a large community of point whores, who infect Gather with meaningless "game" posts, meant merely to get copious amounts of comments, and meaningless comments--which are likely kept in on the clipboard and pasted into every article they can find. On two of my images, here and here, we have comments that give no suggestion that they have actually seen the image, and, indeed one identical one. On it's author's page, we can see a typical point whoring article. If you are sceptical as to whether or not this could merely be shortwindedness, may I invite you to this image. Here we have (as of the writing of this article) two comments. Note that they are identical to two comments that these same people left on the previous images shown. Note also that, vague as they are, it would be quite a streach to say that they were in any way related to the image.
How shall we deal with this flagrant abuse of the system? I propose, first, that all obvious point whoring comments be deleted. I shall start to do this after this article, although the comments that it links to shall remain. Sadly, point whores themselves will not do this, so Gather must get involved. I recommend that a button be added to articles, allowing people to report them, to then be sorted out for deletion. After several infractions, one's account would be suspended, and then deleted. As an additional deturrent, a minimum length could be required to recieve points--say, fifty words. Then we may really have a system conducive to creative and interesting writing.